(ID: 184073, pid: 0) Sebastienczaja on Thu, 28 February 2013 9:21am
(ID: 94690, pid: 0) Rawalanche on Wed, 14 March 2012 10:03am
That is usually due to the more contrast in the scene. FG does not anyhow directly accelerate AA, but if there is more even lighting in the scene with less contrasting difference, spatial AA, which works based on color contrast will have to do a bit less work. Especially when it comes to sampling area lights ;) So yeah, unified sampling, glossy reflections rays set at 1, area light samples at 2, Min1 - Max128 Unified sampling, and then all you have to do is keep raising quality parameter until render looks clean. Start at 1, and keep raising it. Value of 4-8 usually ends up being sufficient.
(ID: 94613, pid: 0) Jignesh Jariwala on Wed, 14 March 2012 6:48am
Good tips Rawalanche! Using less glossy and shadow samples and controlling everything with unified sampling sounds good! I will check that.
As for FG, I noticed that when scene rendered without FG then it's much slower than rendered with FG on. (even with AO projected lighting, it's slower than FG)
(ID: 93658, pid: 0) Rawalanche on Mon, 12 March 2012 3:34pm
Actually, I am using FG all the time, but final gather has absolutely nothing to do with speed of quality of antialiasing.
A few tips to optimally use unified sampling:
Decrease glossy samples on all of your materials to 1. Set the samples of all your area lights to 2.
Set Min 1, Max 128 samples, set cutoff to 0,025 and then control quality of your rendering using quality parameter. It will control quality of everything, including glossy reflections, DoF or Motion blur.
When using unified sampling, glossy rays amount on the materials is actually a multiplier, not total ray count like in case of adaptive sampling.
Make sure all your materials are modern mentalray materials, preferably Arch&Design. Never use legacy shaders (standard material, raytraced, dgs, etc..)
Well tuned unified sampling will give you a LOT faster rendertimes than Min4 Max64 adaptive sampling, as well as more control over final quality.
(ID: 92071, pid: 0) Jignesh Jariwala on Sat, 10 March 2012 2:57pm
Hi Rawalanche, I have checked "unified sampling" and so far I found it really slow compare to quality of current adaptive sampling. Also if you are raising and getting high render times, it's mostly becoz you maynot be using FG. Using FG I rarely get high render times unless there are lots of raytraced or transperent objects. Anyway tutorial is about, how to find and eliminate flickering using diagnostic tools.
(ID: 92067, pid: 0) Jignesh Jariwala on Sat, 10 March 2012 2:51pm
Hi Rawalanche, I have checked "unified sampling" and so far I found it really slow compare to quality of current adaptive sampling. Anyway tutorial is about to how to find and eliminate flickering using diagnostic tools.
(ID: 91946, pid: 0) Rawalanche on Fri, 09 March 2012 9:03pm
Raising AA so high will give you unacceptably high rendertimes. A lot better way to eliminate flickering is to use new Unified Sampling introduced in Mental Ray 3.9, which will give you a lot better antialiasing detail at about the same time, and of course eliminate all the flickering. Also, it resolved rendered Depth of Field and Motion blur a lot faster with less noise ;)
(ID: 91714, pid: 0) Joshpurple on Thu, 08 March 2012 7:49pm
Great, Thank you :) !